Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-05-18 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-05-18 Senate Journal Page 1543 SJR 8 Message dated May 17 was read, stating the House passed and returned for consideration SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 8 Relating to the division of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, with the following amendment: HOUSE CS FOR SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 8(JUD) Senator Ben Stevens moved that the Senate concur in the House amendment and recommended the body vote no. The question being: "Shall the Senate concur in the House amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2003-05-18 Senate Journal Page 1544 HCS SJR 8(JUD) Shall the Senate Concur in the House amendment to SJR 8? YEAS: 3 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Ellis, French, Olson Nays: Bunde, Cowdery, Green, Ogan, Seekins, Stevens B, Stevens G, Taylor, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Excused: Davis Absent: Dyson, Elton, Guess, Hoffman, Lincoln French changed from "Nay" to "Yea". and so, the Senate failed to concur. The Secretary was requested to notify the House of the Senate's action and request the House to recede from its amendment.